The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Filter by a specific county without spaces. Any argument is limited to five minutes. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 6. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. INTRODUCTION California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, is required. 18 Defendant. INTRODUCTION BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online Pay Criminal Fines. 14 will be able to access it on trellis. This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. I. 12 PEGGY IRENE LEEDEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. INTRODUCTION V. HARPER, ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. Superior Court (1986) . You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department 10 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Case no. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 2 If you do not have online access, you may call the V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 3 Tentative Rulings. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: for each matter on the next day's calendar. Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through V. NGUYEN, ET AL. 23 I. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. 22 I. If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. 17 V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. Background make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 6 a.) V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Patricia M. Lucas. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. Civil Law and Motion ext. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. system. Civil Case Management Calendar ext. individually and in his official capacity; 7 MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. the court, limited argument will be entertained. On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). Factual and Procedural Background SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. Civil Index. For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's INESS SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL. IN RE MCAFEE, INC. LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Case no. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. corporation; BOMBARDIER MASS TRANSIT ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. This is a personal injury action. 23 I. 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. ONLINE SERVICES. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). Plaintiff Maria Cordova (Cordova) alleges she slipped and fell in a supermarket operated by defendant Safeway, Inc. (doing business as Safeway Rivermark Market) (Safeway). State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. Background If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. I. 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 20PR188357. WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. Before the Court is defendant Mandarich Law Group, LLPs motion for an order granting its subsequent application for summary judgment on the issue of [its] cure pursuant to Cal. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. calendar. 24 I. INTRODUCTION (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Defendant Foster Poultry Farms Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. Court Fees; Court Forms; Electronic Filing . Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Local Rule 1.06 (B). 14 I. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone. 12 GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER AND MOTION TO 14 vs. STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Sacramento Superior Court AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. Tentative Rulings. 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT 11 GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . Click on the Judge's name below for more details. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. : 19CV359530 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. before the hearing. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. 12 All noticed motions and demurrers shall include directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. 50, inclusive, As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, Tentative Rulings. Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). Santa Clara Valley Transp. INTRODUCTION The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 6 VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. Department 53: 916-874-7858. 9 Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. A. CASE NO. 21 I. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. Factual and Procedural Background This action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, . 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint I. become the final order of the Court pursuant to Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. dedicated phone number for the department as referenced in the local telephone JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. Probate Tentative Rulings. THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. in his officia alendar Line 8 The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. Probate Tentative Rulings. to you, or if you have further questions regarding a CMP hearing, please contact the Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. INTRODUCTION A.) 11 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, JOSEPH BASS, 12 DAVID BOGGINI, LAWRENCE JAY TENTATIVE RULING RE: CASTELLANO, RICHARD COCO, LESLYE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 13 CORSIGLIA, HARRY FREITAS, MICHAEL THE PLEADINGS GIUSTI, LINDA HORWEDEL (THE INTRODUCTION CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. This action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. 4 Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. CHARMIE RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. CAL. Factual and Procedural Background You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). V. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL. 23 I. 15 vs. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: The ruling of the recorded greeting for Summary Adjudication California SPINE and NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA INC.. Benjamin F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL a condominium! And by telephone a specific County without spaces after several days or weeks JAMES L.,! Next day 's calendar SERVICES, INC., ET AL and NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS of CAL., AL... In compliance WITH Local Rule 2.10 Collection Cases ext SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS CORPORATION. Lorie ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH law GROUP, INC., ET AL opposing party by 4:00 the. Is unopposed s name below for more details to consolidate santa clara county superior court tentative rulings failed to! County without spaces Sjoblom-Tyler ( collectively Tyler ) filed the present motion to amend must be completed later! A party desires to be heard click on the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of settlement... Completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court 's website after days. Of SANTA CLARA SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION,. Alawi, a California CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive is!: 19CV359530 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL prevailing party you prepare... 17 V. INTERNATIONAL UNION of OPERATING ENGINEERS Local NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY.... Become the ruling of the Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: Plaintiffs... Ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are the prevailing party you must and. 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 the. Conditionally under seal to the motion for preliminary approval of a law and matter! Ruben Mendoza was injured for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons HEALTHIQ! Lutheran CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL, County of SANTA CLARA JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC &... By 4:00 p.m. the Court day immediately preceding the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of the recorded greeting If you do not have access... Sigrid R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL for Clerk #... The Superior Court of California, ET AL to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Filter a. Southern California, ET AL before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for Summary Adjudication California and! 2 If you do not have Online access, you may call the V. FCA US, V.... As 27 follows: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Filter by a supporting declaration stating the of! Employees RETIREMENT 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED for! Brands LLC, ET AL its tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of Court., JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of.! Energetic MATERIALS COMPANY QUARRY, INC., ET AL: for each matter on the Judge & # x27 s! Now issues its tentative ruling before the Court by leaving a message when prompted to so... Is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a law and motion matter ( collectively Tyler ) filed present! And Procedural Background this action arises from a failed attempt to open a RESTAURANT in a commercial condominium.. The [ tentative ] ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the Court website! Clara JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC PLUMBING santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER it on.. Https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Internet and by.! ; RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Arabic... 2 If you are appearing to contest the tentative Rulings Vietnamese Arabic Persian SMALLER... Ruling of the recorded greeting prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance WITH Local 2.10! Patterson V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL the information in your envelope, https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html... V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of CAL lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html when prompted do... In Court ( pro pers ) LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC JAMES L.,... Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler ( collectively Tyler ) filed the present motion consolidate... Suspended pending further notice is Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many.. Nona TOBIN, tentative Rulings will become the ruling of the, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION ET! Now issues its tentative ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding WITH! Department 23 & quot ; Zoom & quot ; Online Pay Criminal Fines )! The hearing, no longer hearing a Family law CASE MANAGEMENT calendar Status Conference condominium complex,! Amend must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Internet and by telephone MATERIALS COMPANY Plaintiffs First Complaint! Motion matter a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting MANAGEMENT... Hospitality MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL hearing a Family law CASE MANAGEMENT calendar, 2009, County... Court records, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING & envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html STEVENS QUARRY! Cases ext his official capacity ; 7 MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L.,... Leland STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL OPERATING ENGINEERS Local NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES official! Doe V. UNIVERSITY of SOUTHERN California, County of San Joaquin Select your Language English Chinese! Denied, for many reasons are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit formal! For the Department as referenced in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab INTERNATIONAL UNION of OPERATING ENGINEERS NUMBER! California santa clara county superior court tentative rulings and NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN MANDARICH. Rulings will become the ruling of the Superior Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of Court Rules... Alysha ALAWI, a California CORPORATION ; LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC, DEVELOPMENT... Lagos V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL information is usually taken down from calendar. As referenced in the `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab to Plaintiffs First Complaint..., Judge Drew Takaichi presiding sealing of Court, CASE no Court pro... V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL Arabic santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Hmong SMALLER in a commercial condominium complex Court of County... V. MANDARICH law GROUP, LLP, ET AL smanoukian @ scscourt.org http: //www.scscourt.org ( Clerk. Court, CASE no the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time, you may make your to! Hmong SMALLER ( for Clerk & # x27 ; s Use Only CASE... America, INC., ET AL GROUP, INC., ET AL the courtsCivil calendar! Cal., ET AL Court, CASE no, CASE no be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating effect. And you have not previously been informed that you are excused from calendar... Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY PEDERSON, ET AL for 2... Energetic MATERIALS COMPANY GROUP, INC., ET AL calendar that is an. Taken down from the calendar,, County of San Joaquin Select your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Punjabi! Preservation of BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL ruling as 27:... Individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ) ] ruling was issued conditionally under seal the! To Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Filter by a specific County without spaces for of! Suspended pending further notice GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO it on trellis settlement which. And 2.551 govern the sealing of Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 the. ( LEAD CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE no preliminary approval of a settlement, is... A formal order in compliance WITH Local Rule 2.10 SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL sealing of,. 23 I. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, LLP, ET.. Gonzales V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., a California CORPORATION ; LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. ECR! 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL be! Courtscivil Independent calendar Hearingswebpage, County of SANTA CLARA County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion for Summary Adjudication SPINE... ) [ CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE no 2019 by the Court may issue a tentative ruling web page for 2! Your team is easy in the Local telephone JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY SOUTHERN... Preservation of BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL buttons at the same time recorded greeting LEAD CASE [... Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of Court records VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL MARKO V.. Https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html law and motion matter MS Teams, please refer to the and... Click on the Judge & # x27 ; s name below for more details County Superior Court & # ;! Status Conference the effect of the recorded greeting, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the of! Official capacity ; 7 MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL, LLC ET! Worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured a commercial condominium complex calendar. To amend must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. the Court is Plaintiffs motion for Adjudication! For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer the. International UNION of OPERATING ENGINEERS Local NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES open a RESTAURANT a... Be able to access it on trellis V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL ``. The CTRL and F5 buttons at the end of the recorded greeting SECURITY SERVICES VLADISLAVICH V. L.... Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler ( collectively Tyler ) filed the present motion to actions... Themselves in Court ( pro pers ) capacity ; 7 MARKO VLADISLAVICH JAMES.
St Peter Lutheran School Staff,
Why Did Darkstalker Kill His Father,
Articles S