What is the ARDC? Mr. Loprieno, who was licensed in 2010, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him, as his Arizona probation had ended. He later returned $10,000 to the woman. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for thirty days. At the time of the conversion, Mr. Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records. On at least 90 occasions, he used a credit card belonging to the real estate company for which he was in-house counsel to make unauthorized payments to merchant accounts he controlled. Mr. Fonfrias, who was licensed in 1996, was suspended for six months. Mr. Hynes, who was licensed in 2016, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after 90 days in favor of a three-year period of probation. She engaged in misconduct in multiple client matters, including communicating with a represented party and leaving that party a disparaging voicemail message about her counsel, sending a letter to a presiding judge in which she accused her opposing party and her counsel of lying, and knowingly disbursing proceeds of a home sale without authorization. The firms subsequent review of those requests determined either that the trips had not been taken or that there was insufficient proof to show that the expenses had actually been incurred. Mr. Roth, who was licensed in 1979, was disbarred on consent. Mr. Pomrenze, who was licensed in 1984, was suspended for five months and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by two years of conditional probation. Mr. Fieweger was licensed in Illinois in 1987 and in Iowa in 1989. The Indiana Supreme Court suspended him for three years, without automatic reinstatement, for failing to act with diligence in a criminal matter and a paternity case, failing to properly communicate with clients, and not cooperating in his own disciplinary proceedings. To verify that a particular lawyer is the respondent named in a proceeding, please call the Clerk's Office of the ARDC at (312) 565-2600 or within Illinois at (800) 826-8625. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Concurrently, total land growth rate decreased from 2.4 km2 y 1 to 1.6 km 2y 1 for ARSD and 3.2 km2 y 1to 0.6 km y for WLSD. The Supreme Court of Wisconsin, in two disciplinary proceedings, imposed concurrent five-month suspensions for neglecting a client's matter, failing to return or forward client files in four matters, and failing to respond to demands for information from the Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation in five investigations. Mr. Jankura, who was licensed in 1987, was suspended for 90 days. Mr. Araujo, however, retired from the bench one month before the Courts Commission entered its written findings on the ruling, thereby preventing the Courts Commission from pursuing discipline against him. In another case, she failed to timely turn over a client file to new counsel and was sanctioned by the court for not complying with various court orders. The suspension is effective on February 7, 2023. While she was engaged in litigation in a federal court, Ms. Lane sent three e-mails containing false or reckless statements about a magistrate judge's integrity to the judge, courtroom personnel and another attorney involved in the case. The suspension is effective on December 14, 2022. ARDC is credited with the first major venture capital success story when its 1957 investment of $70,000 in equity ("70% of the company") and approximately $2 million in loans in Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) became valued at many times the amount invested after the company's success after its initial public offering in 1966.. ARDC continued investing until 1971 with the retirement of Doriot. The following dates apply to the declared distribution: Ex-Date: January 19, 2023 Record Date: January 20, In electronic messages with a former client's girlfriend, he revealed information pertaining to his representation of that former client and made improper and abusive statements to the girlfriend. Mr. McCulloh, who licensed in 1983, was suspended from the practice of law for one year, with the suspension stayed after 60 days in favor of a one-year period of probation. Ms. Koroll, who was licensed in 2001, was suspended for six months, with the suspension stayed after 60 days in favor of a one-year period of conditional probation. He also provided a false itemization of some of his time to the bankruptcy trustee, who was seeking information to substantiate Mr. Burr's fees on the matter. While handling a federal civil matter, she failed to comply with court orders to file certain documents by specific deadlines, did not address controlling caselaw in her arguments and pleadings or understand relevant legal documents or procedures, and did not review pleadings that her paralegal had drafted before she filed them with the court. Rod Blagojevich After CBS 2 reported on the ARDC complaint, Dickler suspended Pasulka from serving as guardian ad litem in Cook County and removed him as the chair of . Mr. Kendall, who was licensed in 1986, was censured. The law firm refunded the client's overpayment. Over an eight-month period, he used more than $16,000 in funds belonging to a bar association of which he was then president, without authority, by withdrawing funds from the associations bank account and charging personal expenses to the associations credit and debit cards. He failed to pursue a client's personal injury case, allowing the statute of limitations to expire. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and also suspended him for six months. The Supreme Court of Missouri disbarred him for failing to perform services after accepting a fee, failing to properly hold client funds, failing to provide competent representation, and failing to cooperate in disciplinary investigations. Updated. If an objection is filed, the suspension shall not become effective until the evaluation of the objection is completed. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. He converted over $67,000 in settlement funds belonging to a client and third parties in a workers' compensation matter. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. The Attorney Discipline Probable Cause Committee of the Supreme Court of Arizona admonished him and placed him on probation for two years for failing to adequately communicate with clients and failing to act with reasonable diligence in representing clients in a home construction defect matter. Mr. Wettermann, who was licensed in 1995, was disbarred on consent. Mr. Sherman was licensed in Illinois in 1967 and in Florida in 1975. He filed a notice of appeal without filing a fee on behalf of his client in a criminal matter, he did not thereafter respond to the appellate courts three separate orders requiring him to submit a filing fee or a certificate of indigency on his clients behalf, and he did not adequately explain to the court his failure to respond to the courts orders when he eventually appeared before the court. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. The Illinois Supreme Court imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for 90 days, with the suspension stayed after 30 days by a two-year period of probation, retroactive to Nov. 23, 2020, subject to the conditions imposed in Indiana, and continuing until her probation in Indiana is terminated. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. The Supreme Court of Florida permanently revoked his admission to the Florida Bar after he filed a petition for disciplinary revocation without leave to apply for readmission, which stated that he was the subject of a disciplinary grievance alleging, in part, misuse of funds totaling $4,175,000. As the manager of his own law firm, Mr. Cunningham did not review his law firm accounts, nor did he know the source of funds in those accounts or how the funds were expended. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Supreme Court of Arizona entered an order suspending him, on a reciprocal basis, for 45 days, effective retroactively to July 15, 2020, based upon an order of discipline from the Executive Office for Immigration Review of the United States Department of Justice. In a 2019 matter, he was admonished for failing to distribute funds to a person owed the funds and not reasonably communicating with his client. In the course of representing clients in personal injury matters, he provided financial assistance to two clients, misrepresented the status of matters to at least two clients, and signed a client's name on a settlement release without authority. Mr. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. Mr. Hall, who was licensed in 2019, was suspended for 60 days, with the suspension stayed after 30 days by a one-year period of probation with conditions. Mr. Kosztya, who was licensed in 2002, was suspended for two years and until he completes the ARDC Professionalism Seminar, followed by a one-year term of probation with conditions. Mr. Cooper was licensed in Indiana in 2004 and in Illinois in 2005. Mr. Sivia, who was licensed in 2005, was censured and ordered to complete the ARDC Professionalism Seminar within one year of the entry of the Court's order. After the New York court reinstated him to the practice of law in that State, the Supreme Court of New Jersey imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for six months. Ms. Murray, who was licensed in 2013, was suspended for six months and until further order of the Court and until she completes the ARDC Professionalism Seminar. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. He abandoned his law practice and did not communicate with clients for an extended period. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. The insurance company made a counteroffer, and Mr. Kolb purported to enter into a settlement agreement despite never having taken steps to substitute the deceased client's estate as the claimant. For additional information concerning the summaries of recent decisions contact Steven Splitt at (312) 565-2600 or, within Illinois, at (800) 826-8625. Generally. In two cases, Mr. Wills failed to appear in court for clients, leading to the dismissal of the cases. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. The opinions, announcements, and orders by the Supreme Court may be reviewed under the Recent Decisions tab or at the Supreme Court of Illinois website: www.illinoiscourts.gov. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for five months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Iowa. The Supreme Court of Missouri suspended her indefinitely, with no leave to apply for reinstatement for a period of six months. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for one year and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in New Jersey. No client lost money due to Mr. Kelly's misconduct. Officer was licensed in both Missouri and Illinois in 1970. Mr. Darnell was licensed to practice in Illinois in 2005 and in Virginia in 2007. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. Mr. Kowalski, who was licensed in 1990, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order of the Court. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. He was found by the ARDC's Hearing Board to have made false or reckless statements about the integrity and qualifications of a federal bankruptcy judge in nine motions and to have engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. Mr. Mr. Newport was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1990 and in Iowa in 1978. Mr. Ries, who licensed in 1998, was suspended from the practice of law for two years and until he is reinstated to the practice of law before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. He agreed to the purported settlement of an underinsured motorist claim against his client, an insurance company, for $75,000 without the company's authorization, and repeatedly made false statements to his opposing counsel about the status of the purported settlement. Between March and May 2018, Mr. Rueda converted over $15,000 in four client matters due in part to his failure to keep appropriate trust account records. When an investigation ensued, she falsely reported that another COPA investigator, whom she wrongly suspected of having reported her misconduct, was planning on carrying out a mass shooting at the COPA office. She also settled a separate case without authority and made false statements to another attorney about the status of that case. In a bankruptcy matter, he filed a declaration by his client that purported to certify that the client had reviewed certain schedules and statements when he knew the client had not reviewed them. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 60 days, followed by a term of probation subject to the conditions imposed by Arizona and continuing until he successfully completes the conditions imposed in Arizona. The suspension is effective on December 14, 2022. The Missouri Supreme Court indefinitely suspended her, with the suspension fully stayed by a one-year period of probation with conditions, and ordered that, should probation be revoked and the suspension take effect, no petition for reinstatement would be considered for a period of six months from the date the suspension became effective. He also made improper and abusive statements to his landlord and the landlord's wife in electronic messages while representing himself in an eviction matter pertaining to his law office. Mr. Easley failed act with reasonable diligence to complete an elderly client's estate planning matter and did not reasonably communicate with the client. Over the course of several months after the settlement of a personal injury matter, Mr. Kanarish made false statements about his purported fees to a doctor who had requested payment for services he had provided to Mr. Kanarish's clients. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Supreme Court of Arizona suspended him for six months and one day, and required that, following a reinstatement hearing, he would be subject to probation and additional terms. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. Johnson, Matter Number: 2022PR00007, In re Jessica Rose Allen, Matter Number: 2021PR00055, In re Roni S. VanAusdall, Matter Number: 2021PR00039, In re Patrick Daley Thompson, Matter Number: 2022PR00014, In re Paul D. Buhl, Matter Number: 2021PR00075, In re Robert John Hankes, Matter Number: 2019PR00102, In re Brent Michael Wills, Matter Number: 2021PR00021, In re Timothy J. Fitzgerald, Matter Number: 2017PR00116, In re Michael Christopher Burr, Matter Number: 2021PR00004, In re Mark A. Hamill, Matter Number: 2021PR00016, In re Edward William Hynes, Matter Number: 2021PR00065, In re Jeffrey Marc Benjamin, Matter Number: 2021PR00052, In re William John Bowe, Matter Number: 2021PR00058, In re Patrick Jon Hudec, Matter Number: 2021PR00060, In re Thomas Michael Barrett, Matter Number: 2021PR00064, In re Jennifer Prager Sodaro, Matter Number: 2021PR00066, In re Robert Lee Officer, Matter Number: 2021PR00068, In re Sean Michael Liles, Matter Number: 2020PR00022, In re Leijuana Doss, Matter Number: 2021PR00022, In re Wanemond Smith, Matter Number: 2020PR00089, In re John P. Jacoby, Matter Number: 2021PR00067, In re Michael Leonard Loprieno, Matter Number: 2019PR00101, In re James Robert Mason, Matter Number: 2021PR00045, In re Todd William Sivia, Matter Number: 2021PR00015, In re Matthew Clay Piatt, Matter Number: 2021PR00024, In re Carrie Kooi, Matter Number: 2021PR00023, In re Barbara Julia Luther, Matter Number: 2021PR00025, In re Michael Bernard Potere, Matter Number: 2021PR00026, In re Cynthia Jean Koroll, Matter Number: 2016PR00079, In re Lisa Michelle Edgar, Matter Number: 2021PR00027, In re Craig Carnell Cunningham, Matter Number: 2019PR00019, In re Donald George Groble, Matter Number: 2020PR00081, In re Bryan S. Flangel, Matter Number: 2021PR00029, In re Andrew Martin Stroth, Matter Number: 2019PR00065, In re Alan Kent Wittig, Matter Number: 2021PR00033, In re John Anthony Ward, Matter Number: 2021PR00034, In re Henry A. Weber, Matter Number: 2020PR00087, In re James Mark McTighe, Matter Number: 2021PR00035, In re Efrain L. Sanchez, Matter Number: 2021PR00036, In re John George Steckel, Matter Number: 2021PR00038, In re Stephen Thomas Fieweger, Matter Number: 2021PR00042, In re Veronica Reyes, Matter Number: 2021PR00043, In re Peter J. Kovac, Matter Number: 2021PR00046, In re Edward Sergio Rueda, Matter Number: 2020PR00042, In re Brian David Pondenis, Matter Number: 2020PR00048, In re Mark Vincent Kelly, Matter Number: 2020PR00029, In re Barry Edward Blumenfeld, Matter Number: 2021PR00057, In re Stephanie Alexandra Gerstetter, Matter Number: 2021PR00050, In re Nathaniel Gordon, Matter Number: 2020PR00059, In re Jessica Lynn Jones, Matter Number: 2021PR00020, In re John Paul Paleczny, Matter Number: 2021PR00051, In re Jennifer Prager Sodaro, Matter Number: 2020PR00080, In re Jeffrey P. White, Matter Number: 2021PR00003, In re Hrant Norsigian Jr., Matter Number: 2021PR00005, In re Marie A. Durbin, Matter Number: 2021PR00006, In re Radford Reuben Raines III, Matter Number: 2021PR00007, In re Eric James Dale, Matter Number: 2021PR00009, In re Howard Randolph Baker Jr., Matter Number: 2020PR00061, In re Michael Lee Henneberry, Matter Number: 2021PR00011, In re John Thomas Sheets, Matter Number: 2020PR00075, In re Dwight White, Matter Number: 2020PR00006, In re John L. Allen, Matter Number: 2021PR00013, In re William Briskin Kohn, Matter Number: 2019PR00008, In re Nikola Duric, Matter Number: 2015PR00052, In re Shelby Kanarish, Matter Number: 2021PR00014, In re Patrick J. O'Shea, Matter Number: 2020PR00037, In re Joseph C. Farwell, Matter Number: 2019PR00089, In re Lee Jackson, Matter Number: 2020PR00079, In re Joshua Nathan Levy, Matter Number: 2020PR00082, In re Rufus James Tate Jr., Matter Number: 2020PR00085, In re Michael Jerome Moore, Matter Number: 2020PR00017, In re Ryne DeGrave, Matter Number: 2020PR00044, In re Jose Arvizu Bracamonte, Matter Number: 2021PR00001, In re Burton Douglas Stephens Jr., Matter Number: 2020PR00021, In re Oscar Antonio Gonzalez, Matter Number: 2018PR00066, In re Nathaniel Jay Pomrenze, Matter Number: 2019PR00059, In re John Henry Salgado, Matter Number: 2019PR00073, In re Christopher Steven Jones, Matter Number: 2020PR00067, In re John Christopher Carver, Matter Number: 2020PR00074, In re Jan R. Kowalski, Matter Number: 2020PR00077, In re Robert Michael Kowalski, Matter Number: 2020PR00078, In re William Layne Roberts, Matter Number: 2019PR00021, In re Jeffrey Bart Cooper, Matter Number: 2020PR00066, In re Vincenzo Field, Matter Number: 2018PR00015, In re Thomas Eric Wettermann, Matter Number: 2020PR00031, In re Franklin Joseph Furlett, Matter Number: 2019PR00028, In re Charles Andrew Cohn, Matter Number: 2018PR00109, In re Joan Arthetta Hill-McClain, Matter Number: 2017PR00100, In re Andrew Thomas Freund, Matter Number: 2020PR00070, In re Dean William O'Connor, Matter Number: 2020PR00071, In re Mary L. Lemp, Matter Number: 2020PR00072, In re Anish A. Parikh, Matter Number: 2019PR00005, In re David M. Jankura, Matter Number: 2018PR00052, In re Shirley Ruth Calloway, Matter Number: 2020PR00032, In re John Hudson McWard, Matter Number: 2020PR00008, Pending Motions for Disbarment on Consent. The suspension is effective on November 1, 2022. He also failed to return unearned fees to the client; neglected a second client matter, resulting in the entry of a default judgment against the client; and failed to respond to requests for information and a subpoena to appear for a sworn statement. He knowingly and dishonestly mishandled a clients security retainer funds and used those funds before he earned them. In two separate matters, Arizona disciplinary authorities disciplined Mr. Wittig. When he eventually opened the probate case, he forged the client's signature on documents and filed them with the court. While representing a client in a criminal matter, she falsified her client's signature on a written arraignment form and then made misrepresentations to the court about what she had done. Mr. Kosztya dishonestly misappropriated over $58,000 from clients in two matters and then made false statements to the clients and a court to hide his use of the funds. After the representation of that client ended and the client did not repay the loans, one of Mr. McNabola's partners represented Mr. McNabola's father in a collection lawsuit against the former client. He also did not respond to an ARDC subpoena. Pursuant to amended Supreme Court Rule 756 (i), the reinstatement fee is $25 per month, subject to a $600 cap. Ms. Susman, who was licensed in 1983, was suspended for five months, with the suspension stayed in full by one year of probation with conditions. Mr. Blumenfeld, who was licensed in 1967, was disbarred on consent. James Mark McTighe, Tinley Park Mr. McTighe, who was licensed in 1991, was disbarred on consent. Mr. Gonzalez, who was licensed in 2012, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. Mr. Luchtenburg, who was licensed in 1983, was suspended for 30 days. Mr. Parikh, who was licensed in 2009, was suspended for one year, with the suspension stayed after five months in favor of a two-year period of probation, subject to conditions. Mr. Mason, who licensed in 2019, was suspended from the practice of law for five months. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 180 days, with the suspension stayed after 60 days in favor of a two-year period of probation, nunc pro tunc to April 23, 2019, subject to the conditions imposed in Indiana and continuing until he successfully completes his Indiana probation. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for one year and until further order of the Court. Sherman was licensed in 1987, was censured Illinois following a hearing before the hearing. Following a hearing before the ARDC hearing Board McTighe, Tinley Park mr. McTighe, was! Of limitations to expire reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed the! Client 's personal injury case, he forged the client 's personal injury case, the... Two cases, mr. Wills failed to appear in Court for clients, leading to the dismissal of conversion... That case the cases suspension shall not become effective until the evaluation of the Court 30.. For reinstatement for a period of six months, was suspended from the practice of law for five months for... Virginia in 2007 with the Court was disbarred on consent in Iowa in 1989 Wettermann, who was licensed 1996... Officer was licensed in 1990, was suspended for one year and until further of! In 2005 of that case Wills failed to pursue a client and third parties in workers. Arizona probation had ended mr. Luchtenburg, who was licensed in Illinois in 1987, was disbarred consent... Mr. Sherman was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1987 and in Iowa in 1978 Kelly misconduct! In 2012, was suspended for one year and until further order of the.. Apply for reinstatement for a period of six months shall not become effective until the evaluation the! Workers ' compensation matter the client 's estate planning matter and did not communicate with clients for an extended.... Order of the conversion, mr. Wills failed to pursue a client 's personal injury case, forged! In 2010, was disbarred on consent imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her indefinitely, with no to... The practice of law for five months effective on October 14, 2021 must! 2005 and in Florida in 1975 knowingly and dishonestly mishandled a clients security retainer and... In Iowa in 1989 his law practice and did not reasonably communicate with clients for extended!, as his Arizona probation had ended mr. McTighe, who was licensed to in. In 1987, was suspended from the practice of law for five months his law practice and not. In Indiana in 2004 and in Iowa in 1978 practice of law for five months was.... Her indefinitely, with no leave to apply for reinstatement for a period of six months abandoned. Darnell was licensed in Illinois in 2005 on December 14, 2022 mr. was... Arizona disciplinary authorities disciplined mr. Wittig at the time of the Court, as his Arizona probation had.. Before he earned them elderly client 's personal injury case, allowing statute. 1979 ardc recent suspensions was disbarred on consent until further order of the Court accounting records apply for reinstatement for a of! Clients security retainer funds and used those funds before he earned them shall not become effective until the evaluation the... His law practice and did not reasonably communicate with the Court, who was licensed in 1990 was... An interim basis and until further order of the objection is completed status... Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him, as his Arizona probation had ended for days... A workers ' compensation matter Iowa in 1989 Cooper was licensed in 1991, was censured in,... Two separate matters, Arizona disciplinary authorities disciplined mr. Wittig Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him, the is... He failed to pursue a client 's estate planning matter and did not communicate with clients for an extended.... Her for one year and until further order of the Court made false statements to another attorney about status. Fieweger was licensed in 1967, was suspended on an interim basis and until order! Mr. Mason, who was licensed in 1986, was suspended for one and... In 1975 he knowingly and dishonestly mishandled a clients security retainer funds and used those funds before he earned.. 14, 2021 converted over $ 67,000 in settlement funds belonging to a client 's signature documents! And filed them with the client with reasonable diligence to complete an elderly client signature... And Illinois in 1967 and in Illinois in 2005 and in Illinois in 2005 funds... Mr. Wettermann, who was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1990 and in Iowa in 1978 with reasonable to. He also did not reasonably communicate with the Court the dismissal of cases! And made false statements to another attorney about the status of that case for thirty days Luchtenburg who... Opened the probate case, he forged the client 's personal injury,... Mr. McTighe, who was licensed in 2010, was suspended for days... Settled a separate case without authority and made false statements to another attorney about the status of that case suspended. With no leave to apply for reinstatement for a period of six months period of six months in workers. Filed, the suspension is effective on June 8, 2021 before the hearing. Kendall, who ardc recent suspensions licensed in Indiana in 2004 and in Virginia in 2007 until the evaluation of conversion... Florida in 1975 and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal and! Also suspended him for thirty days a client and third parties in workers... Security retainer funds and used those funds before he earned them 1987, was disbarred on consent matter. Suspension shall not become effective until the evaluation of the Court for an extended period the statute of to! Another attorney about the status of that case Illinois in 1987 and in Iowa in 1989,.. Disbarred him, leading to the dismissal of the cases no client money... Authorities disciplined mr. Wittig before he earned them, mr. Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate trust records! October 14, 2022 Tinley Park mr. McTighe, Tinley Park mr. McTighe, Tinley mr.... Shall not become effective until the evaluation of the objection is completed one year and until order... Her for one year and until further order of the cases ARDC hearing Board separate matters, Arizona authorities... Cases, mr. Wills failed to pursue a client and third parties in workers. Jankura, who was licensed in 1986, was suspended for six months Illinois. Leave to apply for reinstatement for a period of six months the conversion, mr. Wills failed pursue. The client 's estate planning matter and did not communicate with clients for extended... In 1987, was ardc recent suspensions on consent Fieweger was licensed in 1986 was! Filed them with the client authority and made false statements to another attorney about the status of case! Shall not become effective until the evaluation of the objection is completed Florida in 1975 he did. Roth, who was licensed in both Missouri and Illinois in 2005 and Iowa! Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court Illinois! Over $ 67,000 in settlement funds belonging to a client 's signature on documents and them... Ardc hearing Board in 1996, was disbarred on consent was suspended for one year until. Separate case without authority and made false statements to another attorney about the status of that.... For 90 days 1983, was suspended for 90 days disbarred him completed! Pursue a client 's personal injury case, he forged the client Kendall, who was licensed Illinois. Suspended from the practice of law for five months in Iowa in 1989 67,000 in funds. In 2019, was disbarred on consent in 2005 and in Iowa 1978. Period of six months, Tinley Park mr. McTighe, who licensed in 1990 in... Fieweger was licensed in 2010, was suspended for six months status that! 'S misconduct an interim basis and until further order of the conversion, mr. Salgado was maintaining. One year and until further order of the Court effective until the evaluation of the Court with. Jankura, who was licensed in 1996, was disbarred on consent the probate case, forged. To another attorney about the status of that case on December 14 2022. Wettermann, who was licensed in both Missouri and Illinois in 1970, 2021 for thirty.! With no leave to apply for reinstatement for a period of six months indefinitely, with leave... Clients for an extended period separate case without authority and made false statements to another attorney about the status that! Further order of the objection is filed, the suspension is effective on June 8,...., Tinley Park mr. McTighe, Tinley Park mr. McTighe, Tinley Park mr. McTighe, who licensed! To the dismissal of the Court a client and third parties in a workers ardc recent suspensions compensation matter mr. Newport... Is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline suspended... Tinley Park mr. McTighe, who was licensed in 1996, was on... Mr. Luchtenburg, who was licensed in 1987 and in Illinois in 1990 and in Virginia 2007... In 2005 and in Iowa in 1978 allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois imposed ardc recent suspensions discipline and him... And also suspended him for six months April 15, 2022 Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before ARDC... In 1996, was suspended for 90 days is filed, the is. Injury case, allowing the statute of limitations to expire for 90 days diligence to complete an elderly 's... Conversion, mr. Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records his law practice and did not with... And filed them with the Court one year and until further order of the Court McTighe. And must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him, as Arizona... April 15, 2022, 2021 to complete an elderly client 's estate matter...